Saturday, August 29, 2015

Selected letters of Dorothy Canfield Fisher

This volume is titled Keeping Fires Night and Day.  The phrase comes from a letter that Dorothy Canfield Fisher wrote to her publisher in January 1920, from her home in Arlington, Vermont:
We have been having a real siege here, with John [her husband] in bed with a badly infected knee and a high temperature and us in quarantine with both children [daughter Sally and son Jimmy] whooping it up with chicken pox, and the thermometer at twenty below and me keeping fires night and day and tending to my sick-a-beds.  Pretty strenuous materially, but not at all wearing morally as there was no anxiety about them, which is the only thing that ever bothers me in the care of the sick. John is up today pretty pale and peaked, Sally is up, pretty spotted and speckled, and I am back in my study to attack delayed work.
It seems like a very appropriate title for this book, published by the University of Missouri Press in 1993.  The editor, Mark J. Madigan, has chosen letters that focus on Dorothy Canfield Fisher's enormous output of work, both her fiction and the constant stream of non-fiction articles and reviews that she wrote.  Once she became a member of the board of the Book of the Month Club, she wrote reviews every month for their newsletter (from which members chose their books).  But she also kept the fire of her commitment to social justice issues burning throughout her life.  There her focus was on challenging racism and anti-semitism in American society, stressing the need for education and life-long learning, and campaigning for greater opportunities for women.  I have enjoyed the books of hers that I have read, very much.  Reading her letters gave me a great admiration and liking for her, as a person - with of course the quirks that we all have.

I have to say that this is the most meticulously-edited volume of letters I have ever read.  Mark Madigan included a section at the beginning, "Editorial Practice," where he explained how he chose the letters to include (189 of more than 2500 in DCF's papers).  He also explained how he edited them (minimally, which was nice).  There is a chronology of her life, an introduction to her life and work, and a section on "Notable Recipients" (who include Willa Cather, W.E.B. Du Bois, Robert Frost, Pearl Buck, Isak Dinesen and her brother Thomas, Richard Wright, and Christopher Morley).  Eleanor Roosevelt was another correspondent, though she is represented here by only one letter.  According to the editor, she enjoyed reading DCF's work and considered her one of the most influential women in America.

The letters cover the years 1900 to 1958 (the last written two months before she died).  In selecting which to include, Dr. Madigan wrote, "[They] have been chosen according to their relevance to Fisher's career and development as a writer."  He defined relevance "to include both direct discussion of literary topics and reflections of the personality, interests, background, and spirit which inform the author's approach to literature."  Because he included the entire letters rather than excerpts (I wish all editors did), they contain personal and family information as well.  There are several letters written from France in the First World War, which report on the war work DCF and her husband were doing (John driving an ambulance).  Many of the letters discuss work that she had in progress, including most of her major novels.  (I am very much looking forward now to reading The Deepening Stream, Her Son's Wife, Seasoned Timber and Bonfire.)  DCF also wrote in detail about the Book of the Month Club, particularly about the process of selecting books.  She answered letters from readers complaining about the selections, telling one woman who was concerned about the "bad morals" of books chosen that perhaps she should cancel her subscription if she was worried about her children reading them.

Dorothy Canfield Fisher challenged racial discrimination in American society throughout her adult life.  In her own work, she pointed out the racism of Northern whites, and the denial of opportunities to blacks, working these themes into her New England stories.  Despite her progressive outlook, however, her letters show that she wasn't completely free of racist attitudes, including the tendency to assign group characteristics to African Americans.  In her mind all black Americans are musically talented, all are great story-tellers - or liars, as she remarked in one jarring letter.  I was particularly troubled by a short series of letters to Richard Wright, whose memoir Black Boy was under consideration by the BOMC.  He was apparently still editing it, because DCF suggested in two different letters that he include some allusion to white allies, working to uphold American ideals, who might have encouraged him in his struggles.  This would in turn encourage those allies.  She said more than once that he should only do so if he truly believed this, because otherwise "even a single word would be a dreadful travesty."  I felt so uncomfortable reading these letters, wondering how much pressure Richard Wright felt not just from an older, established white author, but someone on a committee that could make his book a best-seller (it was chosen for the BOMC in March 1945).  I should note though that DCF made frank, detailed suggestions about writing and editing to other authors in her letters, and received advice herself (without always agreeing).

I truly enjoyed learning more about DCF's life, both through the letters and the editorial framework.  She wrote that "in the long run, most novels are a sort of autobiography I suppose -" but "imaginary autobiography."  She drew elements from her own life, but she insisted that none of her characters were portraits of real people.  I did find in the letters some common threads in the books I have read so far.  Her parents' marriage was strained, with her artist mother traveling frequently to France, where she kept a studio in Paris.  DCF often joined her there.  Like many of her characters, she attended Columbia University, where she earned a Ph.D. in French literature. (She also received at least six honorary doctorates.)  Her husband John was an alum as well, and the captain of the football team.  I expect he provided a lot of the detail for the football-mad Neale's career (on the varsity team at Columbia) in Rough-Hewn.  According to the editor he also acted as his wife's secretary and editor while she supported their family, in a reversal of traditional roles that suggests The Home-Maker and the shared work of the parents in The Bent Twig.  And of course there is Vermont itself, the Eden from which her characters are sometimes exiled and to which they return in their happy endings.

I learned from the introduction that Willa Cather stipulated in her will that her letters may not be published nor quoted.  I'm happy Jane Austen didn't think of that - or Dorothy Canfield Fisher either!

(Cather was a college classmate of DCF's older brother Jim, and the two women became close friends.  But they did not speak to each other for 20 years, after Cather wrote a story about a mutual friend that DCF begged her not to publish, because the friend was sure to recognize herself in it.)

10 comments:

  1. It sounds like a really interesting collection, even (especially!) in the parts that made you uncomfortable. I like DCF for being in a feud with Willa Cather, who I too bear a grudge against but it's many years old so I no longer remember what I was mad at her about in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love literary grudges :) I had one for years against Roger MacBride, who was Rose Wilder Lane's literary executor, because I thought he'd sold the rights for that TV show. But I found out that he hated it too, so I had to let it go.

      Delete
  2. Fascinating that she was such an influential woman in her lifetime yet relatively unknown by most Americans today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She was a best-seller in the 1920s. The Home-Maker was even turned into a film! But like you say, she's relatively unknown now, even with the republication of books by Persephone & Virago.

      Delete
  3. Oh - I agree with Anbolyn, and it would be wonderful for me too to get to know her through letters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do love reading books of letters. I'm not sure if that comes from working in archives, or if I was drawn to archives because of it.

      Delete
  4. I am intrigued, and oh how I wish that this was available at an affordable price this side of the Atlantic. It's sad - and scary - how any wonderful women writers fade so quickly from view.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I saw a comment somewhere that her books are too "quiet" for the later 20th century - which seems to be said about a lot of women writers.

      I'm sorry this isn't more available!

      Delete
  5. The obvious quality of this book makes me wonder what will we do when there are no letters to edit as we're all emailing / tweeting / FB-ing and so much of that will be lost when we are gone (and so much already likely lost in computer disasters, etc.).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we're going to lose a lot of context for writers' lives & work. Apparently efforts to "archive" Twitter have been a complete failure. Email is a little easier - not sure about FB. But on the other hand, if it all can be saved, it means a whole lot more junk. Social media can lead to such quick, unconsidered responses - and so many of them! It's like how now people take 20 digital pictures at a time, where when film costs were high (buying & developing), they made more choices about what to take.

      Delete

Thank you for taking the time to read, and to comment. I always enjoy hearing different points of view about the books I am reading, even if we disagree!