Still in search of books with happy endings, I turned next to Mary Stewart. I had started This Rough Magic a couple of times before, knowing it's a favorite with many people, but the story didn't hold my attention past the first chapter. I find that happening a lot with books lately - I end up starting some of them at least three times before I really settle in with the story. I know some first chapters almost by heart at this point.
From my false starts with this book, I remembered that it is set on the Greek island of Corfu. Lucy Marling, a young actress whose first London play just folded, has escaped grey rainy England to stay with her sister Phyllida Forli in a seaside villa. Phyllida is married to a Roman banker whose family owns not just the villa, but the original estate, including a castello of fantastic design. Lucy is astonished to learn that the castello is presently leased to Sir Julian Gale, "one of the more brilliant lights of the London theatre for more years than [she] can remember." She has wonderful memories of seeing him play Prospero, in a production of The Tempest at Stratford. He has developed a novel theory that Corfu is actually Prospero's island of exile, and allusions to the play run through the story. Staying with Sir Julian is his son Max, a composer. The Forlis have another tenant and neighbor, Godfrey Manning, a writer and photographer. Godfrey has hired a young man, Spiro, to help with the photography and running his boat. Spiro's mother and sister Miranda work for Phyllida. After an accident at sea, Godfrey turns to her to help him break the news that Spiro was lost overboard. His body has not been found when another young man's washes up in their secluded bay. What looks like an accident may be disguising a murder - and perhaps not the only one.
There was so much to enjoy in this book, starting with the setting. I have been googling pictures of Corfu and wondering how I can manage a trip there. (I confess with some embarrassment that, as many times as I've read My Family and Other Animals, this was the first time I have looked Corfu up in maps and pictures, and really understood where it is.) Lucy is an engaging narrator, and I liked her comfortable sisterly relationship with Phyllida. I think this is the first of Mary Stewart's heroines that I have met with a sister; so many of them are on their own, with only distant relations. I was fairly sure from the start who the hero of the story was going to be, and who the villain, and I enjoyed watching that play out. And of course there is the dolphin, a regular visitor to the bay who features in Manning's photographs. He is the means of introducing Lucy to the Gales, and when she finds him mysteriously beached in the bay, Max helps her rescue him. What is it about dolphins? Like baby elephants, they are just irresistible.
The story here is certainly an exciting one, with the tension building right up to the last pages and an explosive conclusion. I don't know that I could pick just one favorite about Mary Stewart's books, but this would certainly be in top three or four (with The Ivy Tree, My Brother Michael and Nine Coaches Waiting).
The constant references to The Tempest intrigued me. I was fortunate to see a production in Stratford myself, with the great John Wood playing Prospero. But that was almost thirty years ago now, and I remembered very little from the play. I had never read it, so when I had a day off from work on Tuesday, I stopped in at Half Price Books and found a good used copy. I started reading it that afternoon. I sometimes struggle with Shakespeare's language and with the twists of the plot (Twelfth Night is a complete mystery to me). I found The Tempest very easy to read, so much that I was surprised to find myself in the final scenes almost before I knew it. I can't help thinking that Prospero should prudently hold off on breaking his staff and drowning his book. After all, he is leaving his island with the men who engineered his exile in the first place, not to mention another one who had just agreed to assassinate his own brother.
"My tastes are fairly catholic. It might easily have been Kai Lung or Alice in Wonderland or Machiavelli -" ". . . Do you find it easy to get drunk on words?" "So easy that, to tell you the truth, I am seldom perfectly sober." -- Gaudy Night
Showing posts with label William Shakespeare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label William Shakespeare. Show all posts
Friday, December 11, 2015
Wednesday, July 8, 2015
Evil characters in literature
I am currently reading two books, or rather a book and a play: Dorothy Dunnett's The Game of Kings, and William Shakespeare's Richard III. Both readings were inspired by Carola Hicks' book on the Arnolfini Portrait by Jan van Eyck, which led me to a book on the Paston family (A Medieval Family, by Frances and Joseph Gies). I've also had Dunnett's Francis Crawford of Lymond in mind since I read an article by Marie Brennan, "Five Things Epic Fantasy Writers Could Learn from Dorothy Dunnett" (it's posted on Tor.com here).
Reading these two together is a weird experience, because they both include a great literary villain. Moving from book to play and back again is like being caught in a call and response of evil. And that got me started thinking about evil characters in literature. I love making lists, but I can't come up with others who measure up to these two.
I have seen at least one production of Richard III, the 1995 film with Ian McKellan. I can't remember if I've ever read the play before, though. As a history major concentrating on British history, I read about the Wars of the Roses, and about Richard's reign, both in historical works and in novels. Just the other day I was looking through Josephine Tey's The Daughter of Time, because I remembered a reference to the Paston Letters. Of course I ended up reading through my favorite parts, marveling again at the passion Tey brought to her defense of Richard. I remember Dorothy Dunnett taking a more measured view of him, when he appears as a character late in the House of Niccolo series. But the pure evil of Shakespeare's Richard came as a bit of a shock. When I read his aside on Clarence in Act 1, I felt a chill:
Dorothy Dunnett's villain is a woman, like Richard based on a historical person: Margaret Douglas, Countess of Lennox, the niece of Henry VIII and eventually the mother-in-law of Mary Queen of Scots. When we meet her in The Game of Kings, she and Lymond already have a history together, which is only gradually revealed. Their relationship plays out across the six novels, to the very end of the series. "From her jealous concupiscence at twenty-seven for a boy eleven years younger had come all of the ills that dogged him." And it's not just Lymond who suffers. In this first book alone she is responsible for the death of three innocents, and the toll will continue to mount. (Two people that I talking into reading The Game of Kings have never forgiven me [me?] for one of those deaths, and have refused to read any further in the series.) Margaret Lennox is such fun to loathe, and I always enjoy the last glimpse of her in the final pages of Checkmate.
So those two are my list of not just villains, but literary evils. I haven't been able to think of any others to add to the list - and I'm not counting serial killers or psychopaths, because I don't read about them by choice. I was considering Mrs. Norris in Mansfield Park, who I do believe is evil, but she doesn't have as much scope for her talents (appropriating cream cheeses and green baize rather than crowns, and really with only Fanny to torment). Also smaller in scope is Charlotte Mullen, of E.O. Somerville and Martin Ross's The Real Charlotte, but then she is truly an evil woman, unredeemed even by her love of her cats. Maybe I will complicate my list with a second rank, the lesser of two evils. In the meantime, I will be keeping my eye out for other villains, and welcome any nominations.
Reading these two together is a weird experience, because they both include a great literary villain. Moving from book to play and back again is like being caught in a call and response of evil. And that got me started thinking about evil characters in literature. I love making lists, but I can't come up with others who measure up to these two.
I have seen at least one production of Richard III, the 1995 film with Ian McKellan. I can't remember if I've ever read the play before, though. As a history major concentrating on British history, I read about the Wars of the Roses, and about Richard's reign, both in historical works and in novels. Just the other day I was looking through Josephine Tey's The Daughter of Time, because I remembered a reference to the Paston Letters. Of course I ended up reading through my favorite parts, marveling again at the passion Tey brought to her defense of Richard. I remember Dorothy Dunnett taking a more measured view of him, when he appears as a character late in the House of Niccolo series. But the pure evil of Shakespeare's Richard came as a bit of a shock. When I read his aside on Clarence in Act 1, I felt a chill:
Exit ClarenceAnd then he goes from there to court the Lady Anne, over the body of her father-in-law Henry VI, whom Richard cheerfully admits to having killed, as well as her husband Edward. All for love of her, he says. When she accepts his ring, I want to Cher-smack her.
Richard:
Go tread the path that thou shalt ne'er return.
Simple, plain Clarence, I do love thee so
That I will shortly send thy soul to heaven,
If heaven will take the present at our hands.
Dorothy Dunnett's villain is a woman, like Richard based on a historical person: Margaret Douglas, Countess of Lennox, the niece of Henry VIII and eventually the mother-in-law of Mary Queen of Scots. When we meet her in The Game of Kings, she and Lymond already have a history together, which is only gradually revealed. Their relationship plays out across the six novels, to the very end of the series. "From her jealous concupiscence at twenty-seven for a boy eleven years younger had come all of the ills that dogged him." And it's not just Lymond who suffers. In this first book alone she is responsible for the death of three innocents, and the toll will continue to mount. (Two people that I talking into reading The Game of Kings have never forgiven me [me?] for one of those deaths, and have refused to read any further in the series.) Margaret Lennox is such fun to loathe, and I always enjoy the last glimpse of her in the final pages of Checkmate.
So those two are my list of not just villains, but literary evils. I haven't been able to think of any others to add to the list - and I'm not counting serial killers or psychopaths, because I don't read about them by choice. I was considering Mrs. Norris in Mansfield Park, who I do believe is evil, but she doesn't have as much scope for her talents (appropriating cream cheeses and green baize rather than crowns, and really with only Fanny to torment). Also smaller in scope is Charlotte Mullen, of E.O. Somerville and Martin Ross's The Real Charlotte, but then she is truly an evil woman, unredeemed even by her love of her cats. Maybe I will complicate my list with a second rank, the lesser of two evils. In the meantime, I will be keeping my eye out for other villains, and welcome any nominations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)