The Black Tulip, Alexandre Dumas
After falling in love with The Count of Monte Cristo last year, I started looking for more of Alexandre Dumas's books. Helen, whose review of The Count had inspired me to find a copy, also wrote about The Black Tulip as a story similar to the Count's, which was enough to add it to my reading list. But I've been slower to read the books than I was to collect them, so I decided to choose one for the TBR challenge. It was serendipity to discover that this was published in 1850, so that it also qualifies for my Mid-Century reading project.
At only 230 pages in my Penguin Classics edition, this has to be one of Dumas's shortest books. But he manages to pack so much into his story: Dutch politics, mob violence, tulipomania, false imprisonment, and a chase across Holland with a rare black tulip, worth 100,000 florins to its inventor. There is also quite a passionate love story - a triangle, really - between the falsely-accused prisoner and his warder's beautiful daughter, who suspects that he may actually love tulips more than her. The action moves quickly between suspense, comedy and romance, before wrapping up neatly and happily in the last chapter, which even gives us a peek at the characters' lives in the future (my favorite kind of conclusion).
Dumas set his story in 1672, a confused time in Dutch politics, with rebellion against the
Spanish crown followed by war with England and France, and conflict over a republican form of government. It's a
period I know very little about, despite being of Dutch descent on my
father's side. But the hero of this story isn't interested in politics. Cornelius van Baerle, a wealthy young man of leisure, has devoted his life to tulips. With his fortune, he can afford everything he needs not just to grow the best, but to study them and to develop new varieties. When the Haarlem Tulip Society offers its prize for the first black tulip produced, Cornelius sets to work, under the constant surveillance of his neighbor and rival, Isaac Boxtel. Cornelius's downfall comes when he innocently accepts a packet of papers from his godfather Cornelius de Witt (a real historical figure). When the older Cornelius and his brother Johann are murdered by a mob in the Hague (a real historical
event that opens the story), the fictional Boxtel uses that as an excuse
to attack his rival. He denounces von Baerle to the authorities for holding treasonous papers from the de Witts. The packet is discovered just where Cornelius put
it, and no one believes him when he swears he had no idea what was in
it. He barely has time to hide in his clothing the three black tulip bulbs he has
produced before he is hauled off in turn to the Hague.
Sentenced to death, he bequeaths the bulbs to Rosa, the beautiful,
blonde daughter of the brutal prison warder Gryphus. He
instructs her to raise the tulips, win the prize, and marry a handsome
young man on the proceeds. Rosa has already chosen her handsome young
man, though she doesn't immediately inform Cornelius of her choice. But
when he is spared for execution and transferred to the prison of
Loevestein, Rosa manages to get her father transferred there, and she
comes along, with the precious tulip bulbs. She visits Cornelius each night, talking to him through the barred
window in the door of his cell, and he is soon as deep in love as she
is. They manage quite a bit of contact through that window! More innocently, Cornelius teaches her how to read and write, using the Bible.
He also instructs her how to plant the precious bulbs, which Rosa accuses him of loving more than her (and with some reason). Meanwhile, someone else has also arrived in Loevestein, and though he professes to be in love with Rosa, it is another prize that he has in sight.
I thoroughly enjoyed this fast-paced adventure, which had me laughing out loud more than once. I had forgotten how funny Dumas can be. This is a much lighter story than The Count! In addition to learning a little about Dutch history, I also have a new appreciation for tulips. I've been looking at Google images, including some stunning black tulips (though apparently they aren't really black, just dark deep purple). Yesterday, in another moment of serendipity, in an exhibit of Impressionist paintings at the Museum of Fine Arts here in Houston, I came across a lovely Renoir painting of tulip fields in flower (you can see the painting toward the bottom of this article).
"My tastes are fairly catholic. It might easily have been Kai Lung or Alice in Wonderland or Machiavelli -" ". . . Do you find it easy to get drunk on words?" "So easy that, to tell you the truth, I am seldom perfectly sober." -- Gaudy Night
Showing posts with label Alexandre Dumas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alexandre Dumas. Show all posts
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Monday, February 25, 2013
The Count of Monte Cristo
The Count of Monte Cristo, Alexandre Dumas
I have to admit, I felt a real sense of accomplishment last night as I read page 1243 in my Penguin edition and finished this novel. I loved it, but it's been quite a while since I read a book this long, and I did start to wonder if it wasn't some version of The Never-Ending Story, with pages being added in the night.
Though I have read and re-read The Three Musketeers, I have never tried any of Alexandre Dumas's other novels. Reading his son's autobiographical La Dame aux Camélias last year made me more curious about Dumas père et fils, and then Helen's post about The Count of Monte Cristo inspired me to add it to my reading stack immediately.
According Robin Buss, who translated and edited the 1996 Penguin edition I read, The Count is one of those stories (like The Prisoner of Zenda) that have entered our collective cultural consciousness. Even those who have never read the book, or seen one of the many adaptations, know the story. In this case, I was an exception. All I knew, from references as diverse as A Little Princess and The Shawshank Redemption, was that this is the story of a man unjustly imprisoned for many years. A great part of my enjoyment came from discovering this story, not knowing where it would take me, and especially how it would end. There are surprises in the twists and turns of almost every one of its 117 chapters. (I kept changing my mind about the Abbé Busoni, for example, right up to the end of his story.) To my mind, that's how it should be read for the first time, and those who haven't yet met the Count should avoid spoilers, including back cover summaries. On the other hand, I'm already looking forward to re-reading it, less for the excitement of "what happens next," and concern for the Count's eventual fate, more to admire how Dumas winds the many, many threads of his plot together.
The part of the story that I already knew involves Edmond Dantès, a young sailor from Marseille, who is imprisoned on a false charge of treason in 1815. He is the victim of a plot by three men, one of whom envies him his career, another his fiancée, and the third who fears being implicated in true treason. While in prison, Dantès meets a fellow prisoner, the saintly Abbé Faria, heir to a fantastic fortune hidden centuries ago on a speck of an island near the Italian coast, to protect it from the rapacious Borgias. If I had only known that this story turns on buried treasure! When Edmond finally escapes the notorious Chateau d'Ilf, he in turn becomes heir to the treasure, the discovery of which will allow him to take his vengeance on the three men who sent him to prison, as well as rewarding those who helped him, or tried to. It is immensely satisfying to watch the serpentine, even byzantine means by which he accomplishes this, particularly as we learn that each of the men has committed further crimes that make this a greater matter than a personal vendetta, Justice rather than mere revenge. And if the hero initially intends that the sins of the fathers should be visited on their children, in the end Justice is tempered with mercy, as it should be.
My enjoyment of this story was doubled when I realized how much the Count of Monte Cristo reminded me of another count, M. le comte de Sevigny. Like Dorothy Dunnett's great hero, Francis Crawford of Lymond, Dantès is imprisoned for political reasons on trumped-up charges. Lymond escapes the galleys as Dantès the Chateau, and both have to re-make their lives. Both are consummate sailors, completely at home in ships, drawn to the sea. Both have a distinctive appearance, though Dantès lacks Lymond's physical beauty, and both have a charisma that inspires deep love and loyalty in their friends and even employees. Both are at home among thieves and smugglers. Both have a Greek mistress and a devoted African servant (though Ali is a Nubian where Lymond's Salablanca is an Arab). Both are masters of languages, of sword-play, of disguise, and above all of planning. Their devious minds weave complicated schemes that play out like clockwork, endlessly adaptable as circumstances change, funded by apparently limitless fortunes (here Dunnett's Nicholas de Fleury also comes to mind, an even greater plotter than Lymond). Both use the ostentatious display of wealth to great effect. I did start to worry that even the fantastic fortune of Monte Cristo would run out, until I learned that he had invested so wisely and safely that he could spend only interest, not principal - a homely practical touch in such a fantastic story. But then Lymond while accused of every crime imaginable is at least never compared to a vampire, as Monte Cristo is time and again. I had not realized how pervasive vampires were in popular culture even before Bram Stoker wrote!
I don't know if Dorothy Dunnett even read The Count of Monte Cristo or if it influenced her creation of Lymond, but the similarities to one of my favorite characters in all of fiction definitely made me appreciate Dumas's Count even more. I will admit though that there where a few times when I almost lost patience with his wandering tale, written originally as a newspaper serial and then published as an astonishing eighteen-volume book edition. There are stories within stories here, and an extended sequence set in Rome during Carnival that seemed to drag on too long. Then I realized that as with Dunnett, crucial clues are hidden in seemingly-irrelevant details, so that a waistcoat that disappears in Chapter 82 makes a sudden dramatic reappearance in Chapter 97. Like Dunnett, like Anthony Trollope, Dumas knows what he is doing, and in the end I just surrendered to the story. I will also be looking for more of his stories now. Helen mentioned a novel, The Black Tulip, about yes, tulips, which sounds like it should be next on my list (after the TBR Double Dare finishes, of course). But in the meantime, I am in the mood for something very different.
I have to admit, I felt a real sense of accomplishment last night as I read page 1243 in my Penguin edition and finished this novel. I loved it, but it's been quite a while since I read a book this long, and I did start to wonder if it wasn't some version of The Never-Ending Story, with pages being added in the night.
Though I have read and re-read The Three Musketeers, I have never tried any of Alexandre Dumas's other novels. Reading his son's autobiographical La Dame aux Camélias last year made me more curious about Dumas père et fils, and then Helen's post about The Count of Monte Cristo inspired me to add it to my reading stack immediately.
According Robin Buss, who translated and edited the 1996 Penguin edition I read, The Count is one of those stories (like The Prisoner of Zenda) that have entered our collective cultural consciousness. Even those who have never read the book, or seen one of the many adaptations, know the story. In this case, I was an exception. All I knew, from references as diverse as A Little Princess and The Shawshank Redemption, was that this is the story of a man unjustly imprisoned for many years. A great part of my enjoyment came from discovering this story, not knowing where it would take me, and especially how it would end. There are surprises in the twists and turns of almost every one of its 117 chapters. (I kept changing my mind about the Abbé Busoni, for example, right up to the end of his story.) To my mind, that's how it should be read for the first time, and those who haven't yet met the Count should avoid spoilers, including back cover summaries. On the other hand, I'm already looking forward to re-reading it, less for the excitement of "what happens next," and concern for the Count's eventual fate, more to admire how Dumas winds the many, many threads of his plot together.
The part of the story that I already knew involves Edmond Dantès, a young sailor from Marseille, who is imprisoned on a false charge of treason in 1815. He is the victim of a plot by three men, one of whom envies him his career, another his fiancée, and the third who fears being implicated in true treason. While in prison, Dantès meets a fellow prisoner, the saintly Abbé Faria, heir to a fantastic fortune hidden centuries ago on a speck of an island near the Italian coast, to protect it from the rapacious Borgias. If I had only known that this story turns on buried treasure! When Edmond finally escapes the notorious Chateau d'Ilf, he in turn becomes heir to the treasure, the discovery of which will allow him to take his vengeance on the three men who sent him to prison, as well as rewarding those who helped him, or tried to. It is immensely satisfying to watch the serpentine, even byzantine means by which he accomplishes this, particularly as we learn that each of the men has committed further crimes that make this a greater matter than a personal vendetta, Justice rather than mere revenge. And if the hero initially intends that the sins of the fathers should be visited on their children, in the end Justice is tempered with mercy, as it should be.
My enjoyment of this story was doubled when I realized how much the Count of Monte Cristo reminded me of another count, M. le comte de Sevigny. Like Dorothy Dunnett's great hero, Francis Crawford of Lymond, Dantès is imprisoned for political reasons on trumped-up charges. Lymond escapes the galleys as Dantès the Chateau, and both have to re-make their lives. Both are consummate sailors, completely at home in ships, drawn to the sea. Both have a distinctive appearance, though Dantès lacks Lymond's physical beauty, and both have a charisma that inspires deep love and loyalty in their friends and even employees. Both are at home among thieves and smugglers. Both have a Greek mistress and a devoted African servant (though Ali is a Nubian where Lymond's Salablanca is an Arab). Both are masters of languages, of sword-play, of disguise, and above all of planning. Their devious minds weave complicated schemes that play out like clockwork, endlessly adaptable as circumstances change, funded by apparently limitless fortunes (here Dunnett's Nicholas de Fleury also comes to mind, an even greater plotter than Lymond). Both use the ostentatious display of wealth to great effect. I did start to worry that even the fantastic fortune of Monte Cristo would run out, until I learned that he had invested so wisely and safely that he could spend only interest, not principal - a homely practical touch in such a fantastic story. But then Lymond while accused of every crime imaginable is at least never compared to a vampire, as Monte Cristo is time and again. I had not realized how pervasive vampires were in popular culture even before Bram Stoker wrote!
I don't know if Dorothy Dunnett even read The Count of Monte Cristo or if it influenced her creation of Lymond, but the similarities to one of my favorite characters in all of fiction definitely made me appreciate Dumas's Count even more. I will admit though that there where a few times when I almost lost patience with his wandering tale, written originally as a newspaper serial and then published as an astonishing eighteen-volume book edition. There are stories within stories here, and an extended sequence set in Rome during Carnival that seemed to drag on too long. Then I realized that as with Dunnett, crucial clues are hidden in seemingly-irrelevant details, so that a waistcoat that disappears in Chapter 82 makes a sudden dramatic reappearance in Chapter 97. Like Dunnett, like Anthony Trollope, Dumas knows what he is doing, and in the end I just surrendered to the story. I will also be looking for more of his stories now. Helen mentioned a novel, The Black Tulip, about yes, tulips, which sounds like it should be next on my list (after the TBR Double Dare finishes, of course). But in the meantime, I am in the mood for something very different.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)